Assessment Rubric Template
Professional grading criteria for surveying education
Field Survey Project Assessment
Total Points: 150
Technical Skills (40 points)
Criteria
Excellent (4)
Proficient (3)
Developing (2)
Beginning (1)
Equipment Setup
Proper setup and calibration of surveying instruments
Perfect setup, calibration & documentation
Minor setup issues, good calibration
Multiple setup issues, incomplete calibration
Poor setup, missing calibration
Data Collection
Accuracy and completeness of field measurements
Complete, accurate data with verification
Minor omissions, good accuracy
Incomplete data, accuracy issues
Major gaps, poor accuracy
Documentation (30 points)
Criteria
Excellent (4)
Proficient (3)
Developing (2)
Beginning (1)
Field Notes
Quality and organization of field documentation
Detailed, clear, well-organized notes
Good detail, minor organization issues
Basic notes, poor organization
Incomplete, disorganized notes
Sketches and Diagrams
Quality of field sketches and supporting diagrams
Professional, detailed sketches
Good sketches, minor details missing
Basic sketches, lacks detail
Poor or missing sketches
Analysis & Reporting (30 points)
Criteria
Excellent (4)
Proficient (3)
Developing (2)
Beginning (1)
Data Processing
Accuracy of calculations and adjustments
Perfect calculations with validation
Minor calculation errors
Multiple calculation errors
Major calculation errors
Final Report
Quality and completeness of project documentation
Comprehensive, professional report
Good report, minor omissions
Basic report, missing elements
Incomplete or poor report
Continuing Education (30 points)
Criteria
Excellent (4)
Proficient (3)
Developing (2)
Beginning (1)
Professional Development
Participation in workshops and training
Regular participation, leadership roles
Consistent participation
Occasional participation
Minimal participation
Certification Progress
Advancement in professional certifications
Multiple certifications earned
One certification completed
In progress toward certification
No certification progress
Mentorship (25 points)
Criteria
Excellent (4)
Proficient (3)
Developing (2)
Beginning (1)
Student Guidance
Quality of mentoring and support provided
Outstanding mentor leadership
Consistent mentoring
Basic mentoring support
Minimal guidance provided
Professional Network
Building and maintaining professional connections
Extensive network engagement
Active networking
Limited networking
Minimal networking
Course Development (25 points)
Criteria
Excellent (4)
Proficient (3)
Developing (2)
Beginning (1)
Curriculum Design
Quality of course content and structure
Innovative, comprehensive design
Well-structured content
Basic content structure
Minimal course design
Learning Materials
Quality and effectiveness of resources
Exceptional materials
Good quality resources
Basic materials
Limited resources
Clear Assessment Criteria
Detailed performance indicators for objective evaluation
Automated Scoring
Built-in calculations for quick and accurate grading
Feedback Tools
Space for detailed comments and improvement suggestions
Assessment Process Simulation
Ready to Start
Speed: